Mike Chalmers Photo Blog

permalink “Surrogates and a New Idea”
I have been absent from the internet for a couple of weeks due to a late holiday (Turkey, thanks for asking - weather great although it rained for the first couple of days) and my return to scholastics. I have been trying (in vain) to come up with a perfect degree film; perfect in that it suits me and what I’m trying to create - a vehicle for myself. I went to see Surrogates this morning (I’m not usually a matinee person but with work conflicts I have to get what I can) and, on my post-viewing internet background-check on the film, was surprised to see the lack of user-created information about the film (and absolute lack of the IMDB Trivia page, one of my personal favourites).
Surrogates seems to be a pretty big film; big in budget, lots of posters at the multiplex, decent trailer (the only reason we went to see it was the trailer that preceded Inglorious Basterds - really enjoyed that fyi, don’t really agree with the polarisation of people’s reviews) and all the standard fare. It doesn’t even have the five (5!) votes necessary to have a star-rating on IMDB.
Now it wasn’t a particularly good film, in fact it will probably blend into the following films in my head until the point that it disappears altogether: Blade Runner, I, Robot, A.I., Minority Report et al. However, it was completely watchable and had some funny, interesting, humanistic, well-acted moments. Fleeting as they were. What I’m concerned about is that I have a feeling I will never hear from this film again (except maybe in the Tesco Top 40 and then in the very cheap bargain section and then no more), though I doubt I’m as concerned as the filmmakers or John McClane.
This phenomenon (of which I may be wrong and this film could do massive box office and be talked about endlessly, of course, though I reserve my doubts) has only added to the weight on my shoulders w/r/t my own project, the degree film I need to make this year - and share the idea of on Monday. I am struggling to find an idea that encompasses all of the following qualities:

Simple (as in not convoluted thematically or narationally)
Funny (at least vaguely)
Logistically possible
The ability to exhibit my writing
The ability to exhibit my cinematography
The ability to exhibit my cinematic style (different from no. 5)

Then I have a selection of themes that I may or may not want to utilise and a couple of genres that I would love to fall into. I think I started this totally backwards. I should have had a simple story and then evolved it. But hey-ho. One of the main ambitions I have for this project is creating something that is at least original.

I’m not sure Surrogates had the same ambition. The film is obviously in a sub-genre which begs for it to be compared to its predecessors and, as I have illustrated above, the poster lacks much original effort. The few commentors in the quasi-forums on the IMDB page seem to be in agreement that “There is NOTHING new under the sun.” as in, nothing original being made at the moment. I beg to differ, but am not going to offer any backup information at this moment. Because this is long enough as it is.
NB. In the time it took to write this (9minutes), 850+ votes were recorded on the IMDB and it stands at an 8.0 rating. Also, I found this “review” website that has put the fear of god into me.

“Surrogates and a New Idea”

I have been absent from the internet for a couple of weeks due to a late holiday (Turkey, thanks for asking - weather great although it rained for the first couple of days) and my return to scholastics. I have been trying (in vain) to come up with a perfect degree film; perfect in that it suits me and what I’m trying to create - a vehicle for myself. I went to see Surrogates this morning (I’m not usually a matinee person but with work conflicts I have to get what I can) and, on my post-viewing internet background-check on the film, was surprised to see the lack of user-created information about the film (and absolute lack of the IMDB Trivia page, one of my personal favourites).

Surrogates seems to be a pretty big film; big in budget, lots of posters at the multiplex, decent trailer (the only reason we went to see it was the trailer that preceded Inglorious Basterds - really enjoyed that fyi, don’t really agree with the polarisation of people’s reviews) and all the standard fare. It doesn’t even have the five (5!) votes necessary to have a star-rating on IMDB.

Now it wasn’t a particularly good film, in fact it will probably blend into the following films in my head until the point that it disappears altogether: Blade Runner, I, Robot, A.I., Minority Report et al. However, it was completely watchable and had some funny, interesting, humanistic, well-acted moments. Fleeting as they were. What I’m concerned about is that I have a feeling I will never hear from this film again (except maybe in the Tesco Top 40 and then in the very cheap bargain section and then no more), though I doubt I’m as concerned as the filmmakers or John McClane.

This phenomenon (of which I may be wrong and this film could do massive box office and be talked about endlessly, of course, though I reserve my doubts) has only added to the weight on my shoulders w/r/t my own project, the degree film I need to make this year - and share the idea of on Monday. I am struggling to find an idea that encompasses all of the following qualities:

  1. Simple (as in not convoluted thematically or narationally)
  2. Funny (at least vaguely)
  3. Logistically possible
  4. The ability to exhibit my writing
  5. The ability to exhibit my cinematography
  6. The ability to exhibit my cinematic style (different from no. 5)

Then I have a selection of themes that I may or may not want to utilise and a couple of genres that I would love to fall into. I think I started this totally backwards. I should have had a simple story and then evolved it. But hey-ho. One of the main ambitions I have for this project is creating something that is at least original.

I’m not sure Surrogates had the same ambition. The film is obviously in a sub-genre which begs for it to be compared to its predecessors and, as I have illustrated above, the poster lacks much original effort. The few commentors in the quasi-forums on the IMDB page seem to be in agreement that “There is NOTHING new under the sun.” as in, nothing original being made at the moment. I beg to differ, but am not going to offer any backup information at this moment. Because this is long enough as it is.

NB. In the time it took to write this (9minutes), 850+ votes were recorded on the IMDB and it stands at an 8.0 rating. Also, I found this “review” website that has put the fear of god into me.

permalink Retro Photo
5/5
The ‘Retro Photos’ are scans of photographs of my Nana and Mac, my Mum’s parents. A few were taken in Italy, which was Mac’s favourite place in the world after he was stationed there during the war.
I made a film about Mac a few years ago and as soon as my new site gets finished (nearly there), I will put it all in one place.
Mac died this summer and my Nana is going with my Mum and Auntie Kim to scatter his ashes in Italy.
View all of Retro Photo

Retro Photo

5/5

The ‘Retro Photos’ are scans of photographs of my Nana and Mac, my Mum’s parents. A few were taken in Italy, which was Mac’s favourite place in the world after he was stationed there during the war.

I made a film about Mac a few years ago and as soon as my new site gets finished (nearly there), I will put it all in one place.

Mac died this summer and my Nana is going with my Mum and Auntie Kim to scatter his ashes in Italy.

View all of Retro Photo

permalink Gordon Brown by Rankin
The Observer Polaroid Project
The Observer gave some of my favourite photographers a Polaroid camera to take their “final” Polaroid shot for the paper, to mark  the final use-by date of the film, next month.
I think they may be unaware of the Impossible Project and the fact that they are now selling at Urban Outfitters (or at the very least the Fuji FP film which I myself use).
Regardless, it’s nice to hear the stories from the big boys and girls when they are all talking about and using the same basic medium.

Gordon Brown by Rankin

The Observer Polaroid Project

The Observer gave some of my favourite photographers a Polaroid camera to take their “final” Polaroid shot for the paper, to markĀ  the final use-by date of the film, next month.

I think they may be unaware of the Impossible Project and the fact that they are now selling at Urban Outfitters (or at the very least the Fuji FP film which I myself use).

Regardless, it’s nice to hear the stories from the big boys and girls when they are all talking about and using the same basic medium.

permalink Retro Photo
4/5

Retro Photo

4/5

permalink Retro Photo
3/5

Retro Photo

3/5

permalink Retro Photo
2/5

Retro Photo

2/5

permalink Retro Photo
1/5

Retro Photo

1/5

permalink Chris part 3.
Click to get it bigger - Tumblr does distort the image when it resizes, I have noticed.
I will resume varied posting soon, I guess I am bad at working on more than one thing at once..

Chris part 3.

Click to get it bigger - Tumblr does distort the image when it resizes, I have noticed.

I will resume varied posting soon, I guess I am bad at working on more than one thing at once..

permalink Chris part II
Now I don’t usually take photos like this, especially on shoots, but I was a little constricted by my minimal collection of lights on location, the absence of an assistant and the sheer amount of mirrors around. So you gotta work with what ya got, as they say.
I decided to shoot with a long shutter, and tried to get some nice streaks accross the portraits from the collection of lightbulbs behind where I was shooting from.
When I first started shooting with an SLR, I experimented with the shutter and came up with a load of crazy lights - some nice to look at, some not so. This is the result of those (seemingly pointless) tests. Not a technique I will use very often, if at all, in the future - but nice all the same.

Chris part II

Now I don’t usually take photos like this, especially on shoots, but I was a little constricted by my minimal collection of lights on location, the absence of an assistant and the sheer amount of mirrors around. So you gotta work with what ya got, as they say.

I decided to shoot with a long shutter, and tried to get some nice streaks accross the portraits from the collection of lightbulbs behind where I was shooting from.

When I first started shooting with an SLR, I experimented with the shutter and came up with a load of crazy lights - some nice to look at, some not so. This is the result of those (seemingly pointless) tests. Not a technique I will use very often, if at all, in the future - but nice all the same.

permalink Chris and Chico.
You simply have to click to enlarge.
Took a few photos with Chris, this is part one.

Chris and Chico.

You simply have to click to enlarge.

Took a few photos with Chris, this is part one.